P.S.Katol City vs Dinesh Teja Marwadi — 449/2024
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(b)(e)(f). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 06th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG070005902024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
559/2024
Filing Date
14-03-2024
Registration No
449/2024
Registration Date
14-03-2024
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol
Judge
1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol
Decision Date
06th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
1269
Police Station
Katol
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.S.Katol City
Adv. APP Katol.
Respondent(s)
Dinesh Teja Marwadi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 02-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 10-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons | |
| 30-10-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court dismissed the case against accused Dinesh under Section 65-e of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, after nearly two years of pendency. The prosecution's repeated failure to file the Complaint and Arrest (C.A.) report despite multiple opportunities and summons made it futile to continue proceedings, leading to discharge under Section 258 CrPC. Seized contraband liquor was ordered for departmental disposal, while seized equipment was to be auctioned with proceeds deposited to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court dismissed the case against accused Dinesh under Section 65-e of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, after nearly two years of pendency. The prosecution's repeated failure to file the Complaint and Arrest (C.A.) report despite multiple opportunities and summons made it futile to continue proceedings, leading to discharge under Section 258 CrPC. Seized contraband liquor was ordered for departmental disposal, while seized equipment was to be auctioned with proceeds deposited to the government. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts