P.S.Kondhali vs Ishwar Digambar Patil — 469/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG070005872026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
585/2026
Filing Date
06-Mar-2026
Registration No
469/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
133
Police Station
Kondhali
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.S.Kondhali
Adv. APP Kondhali
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ishwar Digambar Patil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: 469/2026 - State v. Ishwar Digambar Patil Ishwar Digambar Patil was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle (MH-40/P-1102) in a public place on 27.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and paid a fine of Rs. 200 through an authorized police representative. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his written plea of guilt as a petty offence case suitable for Lok Adalat resolution and sentenced him to pay Rs. 200, with seven days simple imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol
-
06-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 469/2026
Case Summary: 469/2026 - State v. Ishwar Digambar Patil Ishwar Digambar Patil was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle (MH-40/P-1102) in a public place on 27.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and paid a fine of Rs. 200 through an authorized police representative. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his written plea of guilt as a petty offence case suitable for Lok Adalat resolution and sentenced him to pay Rs. 200, with seven days simple imprisonment in default of payment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts