P.S.Kondhali vs Arun Santosh Tekam — 463/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG070005812026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
579/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
463/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
141
Police Station
Kondhali
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.S.Kondhali
Adv. APP Kondhali
Respondent(s)
Arun Santosh Tekam
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 463/2026 - State v. Arun Santosh Tekam Arun Santosh Tekam was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for parking his vehicle (MH-40/P-2432) in a public place at Wardha Phata, Kondhali on 27.02.2026, causing obstruction to traffic. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and submitted a written plea of guilt along with the fine amount of Rs. 200/-. The court accepted the guilty plea in accordance with Section 229 of BNSS-2023, considering the petty nature of the offense. The court convicted the accused and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 463/2026 - State v. Arun Santosh Tekam Arun Santosh Tekam was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for parking his vehicle (MH-40/P-2432) in a public place at Wardha Phata, Kondhali on 27.02.2026, causing obstruction to traffic. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and submitted a written plea of guilt along with the fine amount of Rs. 200/-. The court accepted the guilty plea in accordance with Section 229 of BNSS-2023, considering the petty nature of the offense. The court convicted the accused and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts