P.S.Kondhali vs Arun Santosh Tekam — 463/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG070005812026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

579/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

463/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

141

Police Station

Kondhali

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Kondhali

    Adv. APP Kondhali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arun Santosh Tekam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 463/2026 - State v. Arun Santosh Tekam Arun Santosh Tekam was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for parking his vehicle (MH-40/P-2432) in a public place at Wardha Phata, Kondhali on 27.02.2026, causing obstruction to traffic. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and submitted a written plea of guilt along with the fine amount of Rs. 200/-. The court accepted the guilty plea in accordance with Section 229 of BNSS-2023, considering the petty nature of the offense. The court convicted the accused and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 463/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 463/2026 - State v. Arun Santosh Tekam Arun Santosh Tekam was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for parking his vehicle (MH-40/P-2432) in a public place at Wardha Phata, Kondhali on 27.02.2026, causing obstruction to traffic. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and submitted a written plea of guilt along with the fine amount of Rs. 200/-. The court accepted the guilty plea in accordance with Section 229 of BNSS-2023, considering the petty nature of the offense. The court convicted the accused and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case