P.S.Kondhali vs Sheikh Gaus Sheikh Ahmed — 454/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG070005722026
e-Filing Number
05-03-2026
Filing Number
570/2026
Filing Date
06-03-2026
Registration No
454/2026
Registration Date
09-03-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol
Judge
2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--LOKADALAT
FIR Details
FIR Number
154
Police Station
Kondhali
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.S.Kondhali
Adv. APP Kondhali
Respondent(s)
Sheikh Gaus Sheikh Ahmed
Hearing History
Judge: 2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 454/2026 Court Decision: Sheikh Gaus Sheikh Ahmad was convicted under Section 285 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle in a public place. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. Key Reasoning: The court accepted the accused's voluntary written plea of guilt submitted in absentia through an authorized person, as permitted under Section 229 of BNSS-2023. The court found the offence to be petty in nature and the plea genuine, particularly given the accused's proactive payment of the fine amount through the police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 454/2026 Court Decision: Sheikh Gaus Sheikh Ahmad was convicted under Section 285 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle in a public place. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. Key Reasoning: The court accepted the accused's voluntary written plea of guilt submitted in absentia through an authorized person, as permitted under Section 229 of BNSS-2023. The court found the offence to be petty in nature and the plea genuine, particularly given the accused's proactive payment of the fine amount through the police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts