P.S.Kondhali vs Sheikh Gaus Sheikh Ahmed — 454/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG070005722026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

570/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

454/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

154

Police Station

Kondhali

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Kondhali

    Adv. APP Kondhali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sheikh Gaus Sheikh Ahmed

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 454/2026 Court Decision: Sheikh Gaus Sheikh Ahmad was convicted under Section 285 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle in a public place. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. Key Reasoning: The court accepted the accused's voluntary written plea of guilt submitted in absentia through an authorized person, as permitted under Section 229 of BNSS-2023. The court found the offence to be petty in nature and the plea genuine, particularly given the accused's proactive payment of the fine amount through the police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 454/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 454/2026 Court Decision: Sheikh Gaus Sheikh Ahmad was convicted under Section 285 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle in a public place. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. Key Reasoning: The court accepted the accused's voluntary written plea of guilt submitted in absentia through an authorized person, as permitted under Section 229 of BNSS-2023. The court found the offence to be petty in nature and the plea genuine, particularly given the accused's proactive payment of the fine amount through the police. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case