P.S.Kondhali vs Shubham Digambar Raut — 449/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG070005672026

e-Filing Number

05-03-2026

Filing Number

565/2026

Filing Date

05-Mar-2026

Registration No

449/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

159

Police Station

Kondhali

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Kondhali

    Adv. APP Kondhali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shubham Digambar Raut

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 449/2026 (State v. Shubham Digambar Raut) Shubham Digambar Raut was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle in a public place on March 1, 2026. The accused submitted a written plea of guilt in absentia and paid the prescribed fine of Rs. 200 through an authorized police officer, which the court accepted as voluntary compliance. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment, and disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol

  4. 05-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 449/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 449/2026 (State v. Shubham Digambar Raut) Shubham Digambar Raut was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle in a public place on March 1, 2026. The accused submitted a written plea of guilt in absentia and paid the prescribed fine of Rs. 200 through an authorized police officer, which the court accepted as voluntary compliance. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment, and disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case