P.S.Katol vs Devanand Dhanraj Rewatkar — 387/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG070004842026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

482/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

387/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol

Judge

1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

178

Police Station

Katol

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Katol

    Adv. APP Katol.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Devanand Dhanraj Rewatkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 387/2026 Summary The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Katol convicted Devanand Dhanraj Rewatkar for causing obstruction to traffic by illegally parking his vehicle (MH-40/BF-4740) at a public place on 09.02.2026, in violation of Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and paid the fine through an authorized person. The court sentenced him to pay Rs. 200 with seven days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 387/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 387/2026 Summary The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Katol convicted Devanand Dhanraj Rewatkar for causing obstruction to traffic by illegally parking his vehicle (MH-40/BF-4740) at a public place on 09.02.2026, in violation of Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and paid the fine through an authorized person. The court sentenced him to pay Rs. 200 with seven days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case