P.S.Katol vs Dilip Nagorao Pohokar — 386/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG070004832026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

481/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

386/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol

Judge

1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

179

Police Station

Katol

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Katol

    Adv. APP Katol.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dilip Nagorao Pohokar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 386/2026 Summary: Dilip Nagorao Pohakar was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing traffic obstruction by parking his vehicle (MH-40/P-2037) at Ambedkar Chowk, Katol on 9 February 2026. The accused submitted a written plea of guilt in absentia and voluntarily paid the fine of Rs. 200. The court accepted his plea as valid under Section 229 of BNSS-2023, considering the petty nature of the offense and proper procedure compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 386/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 386/2026 Summary: Dilip Nagorao Pohakar was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing traffic obstruction by parking his vehicle (MH-40/P-2037) at Ambedkar Chowk, Katol on 9 February 2026. The accused submitted a written plea of guilt in absentia and voluntarily paid the fine of Rs. 200. The court accepted his plea as valid under Section 229 of BNSS-2023, considering the petty nature of the offense and proper procedure compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case