P.S.Katol vs Mahesh Prakash Khadse — 381/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG070004782026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
476/2026
Filing Date
18-Feb-2026
Registration No
381/2026
Registration Date
18-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol
Judge
1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
186
Police Station
Katol
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.S.Katol
Adv. APP Katol.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mahesh Prakash Khadse
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 381/2026 Summary: State v. Mahesh Prakash Khadse Mahesh Prakash Khadse was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle at a public bus stop in Katol on 9 February 2026. The accused submitted a written plea of guilt in absentia and paid the fine through an authorized police officer, which the court accepted as voluntary and in compliance with Section 229 of BNSS-2023. The court sentenced him to pay Rs. 200 with seven days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol
-
18-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 381/2026
Case 381/2026 Summary: State v. Mahesh Prakash Khadse Mahesh Prakash Khadse was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle at a public bus stop in Katol on 9 February 2026. The accused submitted a written plea of guilt in absentia and paid the fine through an authorized police officer, which the court accepted as voluntary and in compliance with Section 229 of BNSS-2023. The court sentenced him to pay Rs. 200 with seven days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts