P.S.Katol vs Jagdish Manoharraoji Tumdam — 370/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG070004672026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

465/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

370/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol

Judge

1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

161

Police Station

Katol

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Katol

    Adv. APP Katol.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jagdish Manoharraoji Tumdam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary: Case 370/2026 (State v. Jagdish Manoharraoji Tumdam) Decision: The court convicted Jagdish Manoharraoji Tumdam under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing obstruction to traffic by illegally parking his vehicle in a public place at Ambedkar Chowk, Katol on February 8, 2026. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia and paid the fine voluntarily, leading to his conviction and sentencing to Rs. 200 fine (or seven days simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 370/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Case 370/2026 (State v. Jagdish Manoharraoji Tumdam) Decision: The court convicted Jagdish Manoharraoji Tumdam under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing obstruction to traffic by illegally parking his vehicle in a public place at Ambedkar Chowk, Katol on February 8, 2026. The accused pleaded guilty in absentia and paid the fine voluntarily, leading to his conviction and sentencing to Rs. 200 fine (or seven days simple imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case