P.S.Katol vs Vilas Pyarelal Padoliya — 367/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG070004642026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

462/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

367/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol

Judge

1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

156

Police Station

Katol

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Katol

    Adv. APP Katol.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vilas Pyarelal Padoliya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Case 367/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Vilas Pyarelal Padoliya for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle (MH-40/P-1488) in a public place near Nagar Paishad, Katol on 08.02.2026, under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and paid the fine of Rs. 200 through an authorized police officer. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 with a default imprisonment of seven days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 367/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 367/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Vilas Pyarelal Padoliya for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle (MH-40/P-1488) in a public place near Nagar Paishad, Katol on 08.02.2026, under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and paid the fine of Rs. 200 through an authorized police officer. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 with a default imprisonment of seven days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case