P.S.Katol vs Omprakash Kakshanaji Hatmode — 350/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG070004462026
e-Filing Number
17-02-2026
Filing Number
444/2026
Filing Date
17-Feb-2026
Registration No
350/2026
Registration Date
17-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol
Judge
1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
182
Police Station
Katol
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.S.Katol
Adv. APP Katol.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Omprakash Kakshanaji Hatmode
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Case 350/2026 Summary The Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Omprakash Kakshanaji Hatmode under Section 285 BNS for causing traffic obstruction by illegally parking his vehicle at Ambedkar chowk, Katol on 09.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and paid the imposed fine of Rs. 200 through authorized police personnel, enabling conviction in absentia under the expedited procedure under Section 229 BNSS-2023. He was sentenced to pay Rs. 200 fine with default simple imprisonment for seven days, and the matter was disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol
-
17-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 350/2026
Case 350/2026 Summary The Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Omprakash Kakshanaji Hatmode under Section 285 BNS for causing traffic obstruction by illegally parking his vehicle at Ambedkar chowk, Katol on 09.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty and paid the imposed fine of Rs. 200 through authorized police personnel, enabling conviction in absentia under the expedited procedure under Section 229 BNSS-2023. He was sentenced to pay Rs. 200 fine with default simple imprisonment for seven days, and the matter was disposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts