P.S.Katol vs Rohit Ravindra Surpam — 314/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG070004032026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

401/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

314/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol

Judge

1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

176

Police Station

Katol

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Katol

    Adv. APP Katol.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rohit Ravindra Surpam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case 314/2026 Summary The Judicial Magistrate convicted Rohit Ravindra Surpam under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing obstruction to traffic by illegally parking his vehicle at Ambedkar Chowk, Katol on 09.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and paid the fine through an authorized person, which the court accepted as a petty offense under prescribed procedures. Decision: Surpam was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with seven days simple imprisonment in default of payment. The case was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 314/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 314/2026 Summary The Judicial Magistrate convicted Rohit Ravindra Surpam under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita for causing obstruction to traffic by illegally parking his vehicle at Ambedkar Chowk, Katol on 09.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and paid the fine through an authorized person, which the court accepted as a petty offense under prescribed procedures. Decision: Surpam was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with seven days simple imprisonment in default of payment. The case was disposed of accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case