P.S.Katol vs Rohit Vilasrao Tenbhekar — 249/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG070003292026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
327/2026
Filing Date
09-Feb-2026
Registration No
249/2026
Registration Date
09-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol
Judge
1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
103
Police Station
Katol
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.P.S.Katol
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rohit Vilasrao Tenbhekar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Copy of JudgmentView PDF
Summary of Case 249/2026 (State v. Rohit Vilasrao Tembhekar) The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Katol convicted accused Rohit Vilasrao Tembhekar under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle (MH-40/BZ-6029) at a public bus stop on February 6, 2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and paid a fine of Rs. 200, which the court accepted as per procedure under Section 229 of BNSS-2023. The court sentenced him to pay Rs. 200 or face seven days simple imprisonment in default, and disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol
-
09-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 249/2026
Summary of Case 249/2026 (State v. Rohit Vilasrao Tembhekar) The Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Katol convicted accused Rohit Vilasrao Tembhekar under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle (MH-40/BZ-6029) at a public bus stop on February 6, 2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and paid a fine of Rs. 200, which the court accepted as per procedure under Section 229 of BNSS-2023. The court sentenced him to pay Rs. 200 or face seven days simple imprisonment in default, and disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts