P.S.Katol vs Ganesh Dashrath Agone — 239/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG070003172026

e-Filing Number

07-02-2026

Filing Number

315/2026

Filing Date

07-Feb-2026

Registration No

239/2026

Registration Date

07-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol

Judge

1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

92

Police Station

Katol

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Katol

    Adv. APP Katol.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ganesh Dashrath Agone

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 239/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Ganesh Dashrath Agone under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle at a public bus stop in Katol on 05.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and paid the fine through an authorized police officer, following the procedure under Section 229 of BNSS-2023. He was sentenced to pay Rs. 200 or face seven days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

  4. 07-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 239/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 239/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Ganesh Dashrath Agone under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, for causing obstruction to traffic by parking his vehicle at a public bus stop in Katol on 05.02.2026. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and paid the fine through an authorized police officer, following the procedure under Section 229 of BNSS-2023. He was sentenced to pay Rs. 200 or face seven days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case