P.S.Kondhali vs Wasim Akram Hajarat Ali Shaikh — 220/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG070002952026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

293/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

220/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol

Judge

2-2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

56

Police Station

Kondhali

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Kondhali

    Adv. APP Kondhali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Wasim Akram Hajarat Ali Shaikh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 220/2026 Court Decision: Wasim Akram Sheikh was convicted under Sections 229 and 283 of BNSS for causing traffic obstruction by parking his vehicle (MH-31/CV-6473) in a public place on 02.02.2026 in violation of Section 285 BNS. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. Key Reasoning: The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and transmitted the fine amount through an authorized police officer. The court accepted the written plea of guilt as the offense was petty and the procedure complied with Section 229 BNSS-2023, disposing the matter accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    2nd Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn. J.M.F.C. Katol

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 220/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 220/2026 Court Decision: Wasim Akram Sheikh was convicted under Sections 229 and 283 of BNSS for causing traffic obstruction by parking his vehicle (MH-31/CV-6473) in a public place on 02.02.2026 in violation of Section 285 BNS. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with seven days simple imprisonment as default punishment. Key Reasoning: The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty in absentia and transmitted the fine amount through an authorized police officer. The court accepted the written plea of guilt as the offense was petty and the procedure complied with Section 229 BNSS-2023, disposing the matter accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case