P.S.Katol vs Rajesh Umrav Waghmare — 215/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG070002902026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

288/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

215/2026

Registration Date

06-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Katol

Judge

1-Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

84

Police Station

Katol

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.S.Katol

    Adv. APP Katol.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajesh Umrav Waghmare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary of Case 215/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Rajesh Umrao Waghmare for causing obstruction to traffic by illegally parking his vehicle in a public place at Tar Bazar, Katol, on 3 February 2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The accused submitted a written plea of guilt in absentia and paid the fine of Rs. 200 through an authorized police officer, which the court accepted as voluntary and in compliance with procedural requirements. The court sentenced him to pay Rs. 200 fine, with 7 days simple imprisonment as default punishment, and disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Jt. Civil JudgeJr.Dn. J.M.F.C Katol

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 215/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 215/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Rajesh Umrao Waghmare for causing obstruction to traffic by illegally parking his vehicle in a public place at Tar Bazar, Katol, on 3 February 2026, violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The accused submitted a written plea of guilt in absentia and paid the fine of Rs. 200 through an authorized police officer, which the court accepted as voluntary and in compliance with procedural requirements. The court sentenced him to pay Rs. 200 fine, with 7 days simple imprisonment as default punishment, and disposed of the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case