State of Maharashtra vs Renu Mahadevsingh Dhanavat and oth. Advocate - D. V. Patrikar — 1153/2017
Case under Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 7,8,3,4. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG030399442016
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
9324/2017
Filing Date
03-04-2017
Registration No
1153/2017
Registration Date
03-04-2017
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
FIR Details
FIR Number
3694
Police Station
Lakadganj
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Renu Mahadevsingh Dhanavat and oth. Advocate - D. V. Patrikar
Laxmi Mahadeosing Dhanawat
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 16-01-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
This court order from Nagpur (dated 10/03/2023) is a judgment in a criminal case (FIR 1153/2017). The court found both accused guilty of charges related to a red tape incident but rejected their bail pleas. The court dismissed the accused's arguments, noting inconsistencies in their statements and finding the prosecution's evidence credible, ultimately sentencing them while denying relief on grounds raised in their petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This court order from Nagpur (dated 10/03/2023) is a judgment in a criminal case (FIR 1153/2017). The court found both accused guilty of charges related to a red tape incident but rejected their bail pleas. The court dismissed the accused's arguments, noting inconsistencies in their statements and finding the prosecution's evidence credible, ultimately sentencing them while denying relief on grounds raised in their petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts