State of Maharashtra vs Renu Mahadevsingh Dhanavat and oth. Advocate - D. V. Patrikar — 1153/2017
Case under Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 7,8,3,4. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG030399442016
Filing Number
9324/2017
Filing Date
03-Apr-2017
Registration No
1153/2017
Registration Date
03-Apr-2017
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
Last updated 12-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
3694
Police Station
Lakadganj
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
-
1.Renu Mahadevsingh Dhanavat and oth. Advocate - D. V. Patrikar
-
2.Laxmi Mahadeosing Dhanawat
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
07-May-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
10-Apr-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
10-Mar-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
12-Feb-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
16-Dec-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
24-Sep-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
08-Jul-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
08-May-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
27-Mar-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
15-Jan-2025
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
09-Dec-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
21-Oct-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
26-Aug-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
05-Jul-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
07-May-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
03-Apr-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
28-Feb-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
19-Jan-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
18-Jan-2024
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
21-Dec-2023
N.B.W._Ready
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
22-Nov-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
16-Oct-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
21-Sep-2023
Evidence Part Heard
Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
10-Jul-2023
Evidence Part Heard
17th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Acjm, Nagpur
-
14-Jun-2023
Evidence Part Heard
17th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Acjm, Nagpur
-
12-Apr-2023
Evidence Part Heard
17th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Acjm, Nagpur
-
10-Mar-2023
EvidenceView PDF
This court order from Nagpur (dated 10/03/2023) is a judgment in a criminal case (FIR 1153/2017). The court found both accused guilty of charges related to a red tape incident but rejected their bail pleas. The court dismissed the accused's arguments, noting inconsistencies in their statements and finding the prosecution's evidence credible, ultimately sentencing them while denying relief on grounds raised in their petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2023
Evidence Part Heard
15th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Nagpur
-
17-Feb-2023
Evidence Part Heard
15th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Nagpur
-
24-Jan-2023
Evidence Part Heard
15th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division, Nagpur
-
21-Dec-2022
Evidence Part Heard
16th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Acjm, Nagpur
-
30-Nov-2022
Evidence Part Heard
16th Jt. Civil Judges Senior Division, Nagpur
-
07-Nov-2022
EvidenceView PDF
-
07-Nov-2022
Evidence Part Heard
16th Jt. Civil Judges Senior Division, Nagpur
-
26-Sep-2022
Evidence
16th Jt. Civil Judges Senior Division, Nagpur
-
30-Jul-2022
Summons_Ready
19th Jt. Civil Judge Senior Division and Acjm, Nagpur
-
31-May-2022
Summons_Ready
8th Jt. Cjsd and Acjm Nagpur
-
09-Apr-2022
Summons_Ready
8th Jt. Cjsd and Acjm Nagpur
-
26-Feb-2022
Summons_Ready
8th Jt. Cjsd and Acjm Nagpur
-
07-Feb-2022
Summons_Ready
8th Jt. Cjsd and Acjm Nagpur
-
13-Dec-2021
Summons_Ready
8th Jt. Cjsd and Acjm Nagpur
-
11-Oct-2021
Summons_Ready
8th Jt. Cjsd and Acjm Nagpur
-
16-Aug-2021
Summons_Ready
8th Jt. Cjsd and Acjm Nagpur
-
05-Jul-2021
Summons_Ready
20th Jt.CJJD And JMFC Nagpur
-
10-May-2021
Summons_Ready
19th Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Nagpur
-
30-Mar-2021
Summons_Ready
19th Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C. Nagpur
-
25-Feb-2021
Summons_Ready
18th Jt. C.J.J.D. and J.M.F.C.Nagpur
-
22-Dec-2020
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
22-Jul-2020
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
22-Jun-2020
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
22-May-2020
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
22-Apr-2020
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
17-Jan-2020
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
11-Sep-2019
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
12-Apr-2019
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
14-Dec-2018
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
14-Sep-2018
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
22-Jun-2018
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
15-Mar-2018
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
03-Jan-2018
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
03-Nov-2017
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
03-Aug-2017
Summons_Ready
Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
-
03-Jun-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Apr-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 1153/2017
This court order from Nagpur (dated 10/03/2023) is a judgment in a criminal case (FIR 1153/2017). The court found both accused guilty of charges related to a red tape incident but rejected their bail pleas. The court dismissed the accused's arguments, noting inconsistencies in their statements and finding the prosecution's evidence credible, ultimately sentencing them while denying relief on grounds raised in their petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts