State of Maharashtra vs Rina Jagdish Dhanavat and oth. Advocate - D. V. Patrikar — 1126/2017
Case under Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 7,8,3,4. Status: Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG030397672016
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
9147/2017
Filing Date
01-04-2017
Registration No
1126/2017
Registration Date
01-04-2017
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
FIR Details
FIR Number
3416
Police Station
Lakadganj
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. App
Respondent(s)
Rina Jagdish Dhanavat and oth. Advocate - D. V. Patrikar
Munnibai Kalkhor (Absconding)
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 20-04-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 12-03-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 26-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
| 11-02-2026 | Statement U/sec.313 Cr.P.C. |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court rejected the accused's bail plea filed under CrPC Section 438. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate found that the FIR against Sanjay Shankar Temire (age 38, Assistant Police Inspector) for offenses under IPC Sections 3, 4, 7, and 8 was properly registered on 04.04.2016, and the arrest was lawful. Bail application DENIED, and the accused remanded in custody for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court rejected the accused's bail plea filed under CrPC Section 438. The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate found that the FIR against Sanjay Shankar Temire (age 38, Assistant Police Inspector) for offenses under IPC Sections 3, 4, 7, and 8 was properly registered on 04.04.2016, and the arrest was lawful. Bail application DENIED, and the accused remanded in custody for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts