State of Maharashtra vs Sachin Ramniwas Gupta — 20686/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG030333432025

e-Filing Number

14-11-2025

Filing Number

33340/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

20686/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

433

Police Station

Dhantoli

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sachin Ramniwas Gupta

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate First Class discharged the accused and closed proceedings under Section 281 of the BNSS, 2023 in an old case involving an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities, and continuing the matter would serve no purpose given the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  4. 14-Feb-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  5. 13-Dec-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 14-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20686/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate First Class discharged the accused and closed proceedings under Section 281 of the BNSS, 2023 in an old case involving an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita. The court found that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities, and continuing the matter would serve no purpose given the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case