State of Maharashtra vs Akash Chainsing Dehariya — 18894/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG030305322025

e-Filing Number

13-10-2025

Filing Number

30529/2025

Filing Date

13-Oct-2025

Registration No

18894/2025

Registration Date

14-Oct-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

401

Police Station

Dhantoli

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Akash Chainsing Dehariya

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (rash or negligent act) and closed proceedings due to the case's age and prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities. The court found no purpose in prolonging the matter further, canceling the accused's bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  4. 14-Feb-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  5. 13-Dec-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  6. 27-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 18894/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (rash or negligent act) and closed proceedings due to the case's age and prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities. The court found no purpose in prolonging the matter further, canceling the accused's bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case