State of Maharashtra vs Suneel Vinayak Parvata — 17736/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG030265252025

e-Filing Number

08-09-2025

Filing Number

26522/2025

Filing Date

09-Sep-2025

Registration No

17736/2025

Registration Date

26-Sep-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

346

Police Station

Dhantoli

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suneel Vinayak Parvata

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate First Class (Nagpur) discharged the accused under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, finding the case pending for years with the prosecution unable to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities. The court closed the proceedings, cancelled the bail bonds, and found no purpose in prolonging the matter given the nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  4. 09-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  5. 23-Dec-2025

    First Order

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  6. 08-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 09-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 17736/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate First Class (Nagpur) discharged the accused under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, finding the case pending for years with the prosecution unable to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities. The court closed the proceedings, cancelled the bail bonds, and found no purpose in prolonging the matter given the nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case