State of Maharashtra vs Kamlesh Laxman Uike — 15270/2025
Case under Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 4. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG030250412025
Filing Number
25038/2025
Filing Date
25-Aug-2025
Registration No
15270/2025
Registration Date
25-Aug-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 12-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
Dhantoli
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Kamlesh Laxman Uike
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused in a tobacco products offense case under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, citing prolonged pendency spanning many years and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities. The court found no purpose in continuing the proceedings given the minor nature of the offense, thereby closing the matter and cancelling the accused's bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
-
19-Jan-2026
Appearance
14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
-
09-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
-
04-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 15270/2025
The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused in a tobacco products offense case under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, citing prolonged pendency spanning many years and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities. The court found no purpose in continuing the proceedings given the minor nature of the offense, thereby closing the matter and cancelling the accused's bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts