State of Maharashtra vs Anil Sheshrao Mardane — 15268/2025
Case under Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 4. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG030250392025
Filing Number
25036/2025
Filing Date
25-Aug-2025
Registration No
15268/2025
Registration Date
25-Aug-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
Decision Date
10-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 12-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
17
Police Station
Dhantoli
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anil Sheshrao Mardane
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused in a tobacco products case (under Section 4 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act) by stopping further proceedings under Section 281 of the BNSS, 2023. The court found that the case had been pending for many years with the prosecution unable to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities, and deemed no purpose would be served by continuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Mar-2026
Disposed
14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
-
19-Jan-2026
Appearance
14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
-
09-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
-
04-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 15268/2025
Summary: The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused in a tobacco products case (under Section 4 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act) by stopping further proceedings under Section 281 of the BNSS, 2023. The court found that the case had been pending for many years with the prosecution unable to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities, and deemed no purpose would be served by continuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts