State of Maharashtra vs Anil Sheshrao Mardane — 15268/2025

Case under Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 4. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG030250392025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

25036/2025

Filing Date

25-08-2025

Registration No

15268/2025

Registration Date

25-08-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

Decision Date

10th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

FIR Details

FIR Number

17

Police Station

Dhantoli

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 4

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Anil Sheshrao Mardane

Hearing History

Judge: 12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

10-03-2026

Disposed

19-01-2026

Appearance

09-12-2025

Awaiting Summons

04-09-2025

First Order

Final Orders / Judgements

10-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused in a tobacco products case (under Section 4 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act) by stopping further proceedings under Section 281 of the BNSS, 2023. The court found that the case had been pending for many years with the prosecution unable to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities, and deemed no purpose would be served by continuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused in a tobacco products case (under Section 4 of the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act) by stopping further proceedings under Section 281 of the BNSS, 2023. The court found that the case had been pending for many years with the prosecution unable to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities, and deemed no purpose would be served by continuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case