State of Maharashtra vs Abdul Salam Sheikh Hussain — 13992/2025

Case under Bombay Police Act Section 102,117. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG030229722025

Filing Number

22969/2025

Filing Date

06-Aug-2025

Registration No

13992/2025

Registration Date

06-Aug-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

110

Police Station

Traffic Chamber 2

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Police Act Section 102,117

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Abdul Salam Sheikh Hussain

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court discharged accused Abdul Salam under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, finding that despite multiple summons in this Maharashtra Police Act violation case (pending since 2025), the prosecution failed to secure his presence. The court determined no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing proceedings given no likelihood of the accused appearing in the foreseeable future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  6. 13-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13992/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court discharged accused Abdul Salam under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, finding that despite multiple summons in this Maharashtra Police Act violation case (pending since 2025), the prosecution failed to secure his presence. The court determined no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing proceedings given no likelihood of the accused appearing in the foreseeable future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case