State of Maharashtra vs Sonu Tejram Yadav — 13286/2025

Case under Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 04. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG030220422025

Filing Number

22039/2025

Filing Date

28-Jul-2025

Registration No

13286/2025

Registration Date

29-Jul-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

150

Police Station

Dhantoli

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 04

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sonu Tejram Yadav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Nagpur court discharged the accused in a Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act case under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, due to the case's considerable age and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities. The court found no purpose in prolonging the matter and therefore closed the proceedings, canceling the accused's bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  5. 07-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  6. 05-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 13286/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur court discharged the accused in a Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act case under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, due to the case's considerable age and the prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities. The court found no purpose in prolonging the matter and therefore closed the proceedings, canceling the accused's bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case