State of Maharashtra vs Yogesh Babanrao Lute — 12309/2025

Case under Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 4. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG030206172025

Filing Number

20614/2025

Filing Date

17-Jul-2025

Registration No

12309/2025

Registration Date

17-Jul-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

119

Police Station

Dhantoli

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement and Regulation of Trade and Comm Section 4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Yogesh Babanrao Lute

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Nagpur court discharged the accused in a tobacco products offense case under Section 281 of the BNSS, 2023, citing that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite years of pendency. The court concluded that no useful purpose would be served by continuing proceedings on such a minor offense, and accordingly canceled bail bonds and closed the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  4. 14-Feb-2026

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  5. 13-Dec-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  6. 13-Sep-2025

    Lok-Nyayalaya

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  7. 22-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 17-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12309/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur court discharged the accused in a tobacco products offense case under Section 281 of the BNSS, 2023, citing that the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence despite years of pendency. The court concluded that no useful purpose would be served by continuing proceedings on such a minor offense, and accordingly canceled bail bonds and closed the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case