State of Maharashtra vs Khushwant Singh Ikbal Singh Chhabda — 11244/2025

Case under Bombay Police Act Section 102,117. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG030189322025

Filing Number

18929/2025

Filing Date

03-Jul-2025

Registration No

11244/2025

Registration Date

03-Jul-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

108

Police Station

Traffic Chamber 2

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Police Act Section 102,117

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Khushwant Singh Ikbal Singh Chhabda

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Nagpur court dismissed a summons case against Khushwantsingh for offenses under Sections 102 and 117 of the Maharashtra Police Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that despite multiple summons, the accused could not be located and no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings, therefore ordering the case stopped and the accused discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  5. 10-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  6. 13-Sep-2025

    First Order

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  7. 23-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 11244/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur court dismissed a summons case against Khushwantsingh for offenses under Sections 102 and 117 of the Maharashtra Police Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that despite multiple summons, the accused could not be located and no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings, therefore ordering the case stopped and the accused discharged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case