State of Maharashtra vs Dilip Santlal Jaiswal — 10991/2025
Case under Bombay Police Act Section 102,117. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG030185462025
Filing Number
18543/2025
Filing Date
01-07-2025
Registration No
10991/2025
Registration Date
01-07-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
95
Police Station
Traffic Chamber 2
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Dilip Santlal Jaiswal
Hearing History
Judge: 14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
First Order
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 08-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-09-2025 | First Order |
| 23-07-2025 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Nagpur First Class Magistrate court stopped criminal proceedings and discharged accused Dilip Jaiswal under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The court found that despite multiple summons issued since 2025, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and concluded no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the case for alleged offences under Maharashtra Police Act sections 102 and 117. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Nagpur First Class Magistrate court stopped criminal proceedings and discharged accused Dilip Jaiswal under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The court found that despite multiple summons issued since 2025, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and concluded no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the case for alleged offences under Maharashtra Police Act sections 102 and 117. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts