State of Maharashtra vs Dilip Santlal Jaiswal — 10991/2025

Case under Bombay Police Act Section 102,117. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG030185462025

Filing Number

18543/2025

Filing Date

01-Jul-2025

Registration No

10991/2025

Registration Date

01-Jul-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 24-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

95

Police Station

Traffic Chamber 2

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Police Act Section 102,117

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dilip Santlal Jaiswal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Nagpur First Class Magistrate court stopped criminal proceedings and discharged accused Dilip Jaiswal under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The court found that despite multiple summons issued since 2025, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and concluded no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the case for alleged offences under Maharashtra Police Act sections 102 and 117. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  5. 08-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  6. 13-Sep-2025

    First Order

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  7. 23-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 01-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10991/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Nagpur First Class Magistrate court stopped criminal proceedings and discharged accused Dilip Jaiswal under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS). The court found that despite multiple summons issued since 2025, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and concluded no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the case for alleged offences under Maharashtra Police Act sections 102 and 117. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case