State of Maharashtra vs Laxmi Bansilal Bhandari — 10989/2025
Case under Bombay Police Act Section 102,117. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG030185452025
Filing Number
18542/2025
Filing Date
01-Jul-2025
Registration No
10989/2025
Registration Date
01-Jul-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
94
Police Station
Traffic Chamber 2
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Laxmi Bansilal Bhandari
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Nagpur court dismissed a summons case against Laxmi Bhandari for offenses under sections 102 and 117 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The court invoked Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita to stop proceedings and discharge the accused, finding that despite repeated summons since 2025, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
19-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
10-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
13-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
23-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jul-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 10989/2025
Summary: The Nagpur court dismissed a summons case against Laxmi Bhandari for offenses under sections 102 and 117 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The court invoked Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita to stop proceedings and discharge the accused, finding that despite repeated summons since 2025, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence and no fruitful purpose would be served by continuing the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts