State of Maharashtra vs Vijay Krushnarao Dhare — 2211/2018

Case under Wild Life (protection) Act Section 9,11,12,39,43,48a,49,50,51,57. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHNG030184482018

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

18368/2018

Filing Date

14-06-2018

Registration No

2211/2018

Registration Date

14-06-2018

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.

FIR Details

FIR Number

24

Police Station

Ambazari

Year

2008

Acts & Sections

WILD LIFE (PROTECTION) ACT Section 9,11,12,39,43,48a,49,50,51,57

Petitioner(s)

State of Maharashtra

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Vijay Krushnarao Dhare

Sushil Kumar Hariprasad Rai

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.

10-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

03-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

22-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

13-11-2025

Evidence Part Heard

30-10-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

13-11-2025
Evidence

Summary: In Criminal Case No. 2211/2018 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur, the court completed the cross-examination of Witness No. 3 on 13.11.2025. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding the investigation officer's failure to produce required documents, prepare panchnamas (official records), and properly document the crime scene proceedings. The petition was dismissed (फेरतपास - काही नाही / no further examination), and the hearing concluded with the court's acceptance of arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Case No. 2211/2018 before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur, the court completed the cross-examination of Witness No. 3 on 13.11.2025. The court recorded the witness's testimony regarding the investigation officer's failure to produce required documents, prepare panchnamas (official records), and properly document the crime scene proceedings. The petition was dismissed (फेरतपास - काही नाही / no further examination), and the hearing concluded with the court's acceptance of arguments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case