State of Maharashtra vs Kusum Raju Kesiya and 1 Advocate - D. V. Patrikar — 302132/2015
Case under Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Section 3,4,7,8. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case
CNR: MHNG030181562015
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
318535/2015
Filing Date
23-06-2015
Registration No
302132/2015
Registration Date
23-06-2015
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
FIR Details
FIR Number
3084
Police Station
Lakadganj
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Kusum Raju Kesiya and 1 Advocate - D. V. Patrikar
Munnibai Tikaram Kalkhor
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 26-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-02-2026 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Summary: The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate rejected the bail petition and dismissed it. The accused, Kusoom Raju Kasiya (age 30), was charged with indecent behavior and exposure in a public area near Gangajamuna area. Despite the accused's denial and counter-arguments challenging the prosecution's evidence, the court found sufficient grounds to proceed with the case based on the investigation and witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate rejected the bail petition and dismissed it. The accused, Kusoom Raju Kasiya (age 30), was charged with indecent behavior and exposure in a public area near Gangajamuna area. Despite the accused's denial and counter-arguments challenging the prosecution's evidence, the court found sufficient grounds to proceed with the case based on the investigation and witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts