State of Maharashtra vs Manisha Haridas Ramteke — 10196/2025

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e). Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG030166262025

e-Filing Number

12-06-2025

Filing Number

16623/2025

Filing Date

12-Jun-2025

Registration No

10196/2025

Registration Date

19-Jun-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

301

Police Station

Kalamna

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 65(e)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manisha Haridas Ramteke

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Nagpur Court stopped proceedings against Manisha Ramteke under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and the Investigating Officer's failure to file the Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report despite ample opportunity, making it impossible to establish possession of prohibited substance or liquor. The court forfeited bail bonds (if any) and ordered seized liquor sent to the State Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  5. 21-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

  6. 12-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 12-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 10196/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur Court stopped proceedings against Manisha Ramteke under Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita due to prosecution's failure to secure the accused's presence and the Investigating Officer's failure to file the Chemical Analysis (C.A.) report despite ample opportunity, making it impossible to establish possession of prohibited substance or liquor. The court forfeited bail bonds (if any) and ordered seized liquor sent to the State Excise Department for disposal after the appeal period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case