State of Maharashtra vs Mohmmad Efaj Parvej Khan — 7038/2025

Case under Bombay Police Act Section 33,135. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 10th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG030127682025

Filing Number

12766/2025

Filing Date

08-May-2025

Registration No

7038/2025

Registration Date

08-May-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

Decision Date

10-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

13

Police Station

Ganeshpeth

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bombay Police Act Section 33,135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mohmmad Efaj Parvej Khan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, citing the case's considerable age and the prosecution's inability to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities. The court found no purpose in prolonging the proceedings further and accordingly closed the matter, cancelling the bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  5. 09-Dec-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  6. 17-Oct-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  7. 31-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

  8. 09-May-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 08-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7038/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused under Section 281 of BNSS, 2023, citing the case's considerable age and the prosecution's inability to secure the accused's presence despite sufficient opportunities. The court found no purpose in prolonging the proceedings further and accordingly closed the matter, cancelling the bail bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case