State of Maharashtra vs Ram Shantaram Rakha — 7615/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG030107602025
e-Filing Number
27-03-2025
Filing Number
10758/2025
Filing Date
23-Apr-2025
Registration No
7615/2025
Registration Date
19-May-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
632
Police Station
Pardi
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ram Shantaram Rakha
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Nagpur court discharged accused Ram Rakha and terminated proceedings under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, finding that the prosecution failed to secure his presence despite summons in a case pending since 2025 for an offense under Section 285 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The court determined that continuing the case would serve no fruitful purpose given the impossibility of the accused appearing in the foreseeable future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
09-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
20-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
12-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
09-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
13-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
02-Jul-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 7615/2025
The Nagpur court discharged accused Ram Rakha and terminated proceedings under Section 281 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, finding that the prosecution failed to secure his presence despite summons in a case pending since 2025 for an offense under Section 285 of the Bhartiya Nyay Sanhita. The court determined that continuing the case would serve no fruitful purpose given the impossibility of the accused appearing in the foreseeable future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts