Santosh Derha Sarbarsathi vs State of Maharashtra through Kalmana Police Station — 1288/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 27th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG030074982026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

7498/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

1288/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

Decision Date

27th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

282

Police Station

Kalamna

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Santosh Derha Sarbarsathi

Adv. SARAF NAKUL NITIN

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra through Kalmana Police Station

Hearing History

Judge: 14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

27-03-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

Order

20-03-2026

Reply/Say

17-03-2026

Reply/Say

12-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

27-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Nagpur First Class Magistrate Court granted interim custody of seized gold mangalsutra ornaments (8.83 grams) valued at ₹1,30,000 to applicant Santosh Derha, ordering release upon submission of an indemnity bond and strict conditions prohibiting any alteration, transfer, or sale of the items. The court found the applicant entitled to interim custody based on documentary evidence and the investigating officer's confirmation that no other claims existed for the seized property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Nagpur First Class Magistrate Court granted interim custody of seized gold mangalsutra ornaments (8.83 grams) valued at ₹1,30,000 to applicant Santosh Derha, ordering release upon submission of an indemnity bond and strict conditions prohibiting any alteration, transfer, or sale of the items. The court found the applicant entitled to interim custody based on documentary evidence and the investigating officer's confirmation that no other claims existed for the seized property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case