Pushpa Arvind Khadatkar vs State of Maharashtra — 1269/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG030072792026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
7279/2026
Filing Date
09-03-2026
Registration No
1269/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
13-6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur
Decision Date
23rd March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
64
Police Station
Nandanwan
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pushpa Arvind Khadatkar
Adv. GADGE MILIND ASHOK
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 13-6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur
Disposed
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 23-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed Sau. Pushpa Khadatkar's application for release of her seized mobile handset (Redmi Note 11 Pro+, IMEI No. 860041056314183) seized in a gambling case. The court found her ownership prima facie established through tax invoice and Aadhaar card, and that retaining the device would cause damage without serving investigative purposes. The mobile was ordered released upon execution of a Rs. 20,000 indemnity bond, with conditions prohibiting sale or transfer without court permission and requiring production as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed Sau. Pushpa Khadatkar's application for release of her seized mobile handset (Redmi Note 11 Pro+, IMEI No. 860041056314183) seized in a gambling case. The court found her ownership prima facie established through tax invoice and Aadhaar card, and that retaining the device would cause damage without serving investigative purposes. The mobile was ordered released upon execution of a Rs. 20,000 indemnity bond, with conditions prohibiting sale or transfer without court permission and requiring production as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts