Pushpa Arvind Khadatkar vs State of Maharashtra — 1269/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG030072792026

e-Filing Number

09-03-2026

Filing Number

7279/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

1269/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

13-6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

64

Police Station

Nandanwan

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pushpa Arvind Khadatkar

    Adv. GADGE MILIND ASHOK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed Sau. Pushpa Khadatkar's application for release of her seized mobile handset (Redmi Note 11 Pro+, IMEI No. 860041056314183) seized in a gambling case. The court found her ownership prima facie established through tax invoice and Aadhaar card, and that retaining the device would cause damage without serving investigative purposes. The mobile was ordered released upon execution of a Rs. 20,000 indemnity bond, with conditions prohibiting sale or transfer without court permission and requiring production as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1269/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed Sau. Pushpa Khadatkar's application for release of her seized mobile handset (Redmi Note 11 Pro+, IMEI No. 860041056314183) seized in a gambling case. The court found her ownership prima facie established through tax invoice and Aadhaar card, and that retaining the device would cause damage without serving investigative purposes. The mobile was ordered released upon execution of a Rs. 20,000 indemnity bond, with conditions prohibiting sale or transfer without court permission and requiring production as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case