Akhil Sheikh Karim Sheikh vs State of Maharashtra — 1157/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG030064772026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

6477/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

1157/2026

Registration Date

04-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

13-6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Akhil Sheikh Karim Sheikh

    Adv. PATRIKAR PRAMOD PRABHAKARRAO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed applicant Akhil Sheikh Karim Sheikh's application for interim custody of his seized Hero Splendor two-wheeler (Reg. No. MH-40-CF-9652). The court found that the applicant prima facie owns the vehicle based on submitted documentation and no other claimant had come forward. The vehicle was released on condition that the applicant execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,00,000, not alienate or dispose of the vehicle until final case disposal, and produce it as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur

  5. 04-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1157/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed applicant Akhil Sheikh Karim Sheikh's application for interim custody of his seized Hero Splendor two-wheeler (Reg. No. MH-40-CF-9652). The court found that the applicant prima facie owns the vehicle based on submitted documentation and no other claimant had come forward. The vehicle was released on condition that the applicant execute an indemnity bond of Rs. 1,00,000, not alienate or dispose of the vehicle until final case disposal, and produce it as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case