State of Maharashtra vs Tufail Ahmd Vasi ahmed — 6471/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG030062532026

e-Filing Number

26-02-2026

Filing Number

6253/2026

Filing Date

26-Feb-2026

Registration No

6471/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

13-6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 12-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1013

Police Station

Sitabuldi

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra

    Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Tufail Ahmd Vasi ahmed

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary The JMFC Court No. 2, Nagpur convicted the accused under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (keeping a licensed shop open beyond permitted hours) after the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 300/- with one day's simple imprisonment in default, considering it his first offense and taking a lenient view. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Paper Book

    6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6471/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The JMFC Court No. 2, Nagpur convicted the accused under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023 (keeping a licensed shop open beyond permitted hours) after the accused voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 300/- with one day's simple imprisonment in default, considering it his first offense and taking a lenient view. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case