Shriram Bhikaji Thorave vs State of Maharashtra — 995/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG030058422026
e-Filing Number
20-02-2026
Filing Number
5842/2026
Filing Date
24-Feb-2026
Registration No
995/2026
Registration Date
24-Feb-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
13-6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 12-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shriram Bhikaji Thorave
Adv. JAMBHULKAR LUKESHNI ANIL
-
2.Subhash S/o Ashok Kunjir
Adv. JAMBHULKAR LUKESHNI ANIL
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary The court allowed Shriram Bhikaji Thorave's application for interim custody of his seized 16 CU M-Tipper vehicle (registration MH-12-TV-0835), finding him to be the rightful owner based on verified RC book and other ownership documents with no competing claims. The vehicle was released to his Power of Attorney Holder upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 40 lakh, with conditions that he cannot alienate or dispose of it until final case decision and must produce it as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur
-
13-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur
-
10-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur
-
04-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
6th Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C.Nagpur
-
24-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 995/2026
Case Summary The court allowed Shriram Bhikaji Thorave's application for interim custody of his seized 16 CU M-Tipper vehicle (registration MH-12-TV-0835), finding him to be the rightful owner based on verified RC book and other ownership documents with no competing claims. The vehicle was released to his Power of Attorney Holder upon executing an indemnity bond of Rs. 40 lakh, with conditions that he cannot alienate or dispose of it until final case decision and must produce it as required by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts