State of Maharashtra vs Rajkumar Ramker Gupta — 3452/2025
Case under Bombay Police Act Section 102,117. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG030052492025
Filing Number
5248/2025
Filing Date
05-Mar-2025
Registration No
3452/2025
Registration Date
05-Mar-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
20
Police Station
Traffic Chamber 2
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Rajkumar Ramker Gupta
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The JMFC Nagpur court dismissed proceedings against accused Rajkumar in a summons case involving offences under Sections 102 and 117 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The court invoked Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita to stop the case and discharge the accused, finding that prosecution failed to secure his presence despite summons issuance and there was no likelihood of his appearance in the foreseeable future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
19-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
10-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
13-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
10-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
13th Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
22-Mar-2025
Awaiting Summons
17th Jt.C.J.Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
-
17-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Mar-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 3452/2025
The JMFC Nagpur court dismissed proceedings against accused Rajkumar in a summons case involving offences under Sections 102 and 117 of the Maharashtra Police Act. The court invoked Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita to stop the case and discharge the accused, finding that prosecution failed to secure his presence despite summons issuance and there was no likelihood of his appearance in the foreseeable future. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts