SALEEM KHAN MEHMOOD KHAN vs State of Maharashtra — 882/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 497,503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG030049702026
e-Filing Number
16-02-2026
Filing Number
4970/2026
Filing Date
17-02-2026
Registration No
882/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
52
Police Station
Pardi
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SALEEM KHAN MEHMOOD KHAN
Adv. JAMGADE HARSHINY DADARAO
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
Disposed
Order
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 09-03-2026 | Order |
| 05-03-2026 | Hearing |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing |
| 24-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Nagpur court approved the petitioner Saleem Khan's application for interim custody of a seized vehicle (registration MH-31-CB-6050) under Section 503 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found that the vehicle belongs to the petitioner as per registration documents, is unnecessary for the ongoing investigation into the criminal case, and could suffer deterioration if left in police custody. The vehicle was ordered released to the petitioner upon deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs security and compliance with specified conditions including preservation of the vehicle's original condition and submission of photographic evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Nagpur court approved the petitioner Saleem Khan's application for interim custody of a seized vehicle (registration MH-31-CB-6050) under Section 503 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court found that the vehicle belongs to the petitioner as per registration documents, is unnecessary for the ongoing investigation into the criminal case, and could suffer deterioration if left in police custody. The vehicle was ordered released to the petitioner upon deposit of Rs. 10 lakhs security and compliance with specified conditions including preservation of the vehicle's original condition and submission of photographic evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts