Bhuphilendar Ramcharan Singh vs State of Maharashtra — 789/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG030045952026
e-Filing Number
12-02-2026
Filing Number
4595/2026
Filing Date
13-02-2026
Registration No
789/2026
Registration Date
13-02-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
FIR Details
FIR Number
961
Police Station
Kalamna
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bhuphilendar Ramcharan Singh
Adv. MOHATA SHYAMSUNDAR AJAY
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
State Of Maharashtra Through Food Safety Officer
Hearing History
Judge: 14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
Disposed
Hearing
Hearing
Hearing
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 04-03-2026 | Hearing | |
| 26-02-2026 | Hearing | |
| 24-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Nagpur First Class Magistrate's Court granted the applicant Bhupendra Ramcharan Singh's petition under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of a seized Eicher Pro 3019 truck and two mobile phones, after finding he had legitimate ownership claims supported by vehicle registration documents and a power of attorney from his wife. The court imposed strict conditions including a security bond of ₹35,20,000, prohibition on altering or transferring the items, and requirement for investigative officer verification before custody transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Nagpur First Class Magistrate's Court granted the applicant Bhupendra Ramcharan Singh's petition under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of a seized Eicher Pro 3019 truck and two mobile phones, after finding he had legitimate ownership claims supported by vehicle registration documents and a power of attorney from his wife. The court imposed strict conditions including a security bond of ₹35,20,000, prohibition on altering or transferring the items, and requirement for investigative officer verification before custody transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts