Bhuphilendar Ramcharan Singh vs State of Maharashtra — 789/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 18th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG030045952026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

12-02-2026

Filing Number

4595/2026

Filing Date

13-02-2026

Registration No

789/2026

Registration Date

13-02-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

Decision Date

18th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

961

Police Station

Kalamna

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503,

Petitioner(s)

Bhuphilendar Ramcharan Singh

Adv. MOHATA SHYAMSUNDAR AJAY

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra

State Of Maharashtra Through Food Safety Officer

Hearing History

Judge: 14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

18-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Hearing

04-03-2026

Hearing

26-02-2026

Hearing

24-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

18-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The Nagpur First Class Magistrate's Court granted the applicant Bhupendra Ramcharan Singh's petition under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of a seized Eicher Pro 3019 truck and two mobile phones, after finding he had legitimate ownership claims supported by vehicle registration documents and a power of attorney from his wife. The court imposed strict conditions including a security bond of ₹35,20,000, prohibition on altering or transferring the items, and requirement for investigative officer verification before custody transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Nagpur First Class Magistrate's Court granted the applicant Bhupendra Ramcharan Singh's petition under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of a seized Eicher Pro 3019 truck and two mobile phones, after finding he had legitimate ownership claims supported by vehicle registration documents and a power of attorney from his wife. The court imposed strict conditions including a security bond of ₹35,20,000, prohibition on altering or transferring the items, and requirement for investigative officer verification before custody transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case