SUMAN GIRDHARI SAMAL vs The State of maharashtra — 777/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 22nd April 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG030044492026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

4449/2026

Filing Date

12-02-2026

Registration No

777/2026

Registration Date

12-02-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

Decision Date

22nd April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

FIR Details

FIR Number

778

Police Station

Kalamna

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

SUMAN GIRDHARI SAMAL

Adv. VIPIN PRABHAKAR SAMARTH

Respondent(s)

The State of maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur

22-04-2026

Disposed

18-04-2026

Order

16-04-2026

Order

13-04-2026

Hearing

08-04-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

22-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court granted the petitioner Suman Girdhari Samal's application for interim custody of seized gold and silver jewelry (valued at ₹7,50,000) under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner claimed the items were received as dowry during her marriage and were stolen from her home. The court found the petitioner had established prima facie ownership, and ordered release of the articles on furnishing a surety bond and strict conditions to prevent tampering or transfer of the property during the criminal investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted the petitioner Suman Girdhari Samal's application for interim custody of seized gold and silver jewelry (valued at ₹7,50,000) under Section 503 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The petitioner claimed the items were received as dowry during her marriage and were stolen from her home. The court found the petitioner had established prima facie ownership, and ordered release of the articles on furnishing a surety bond and strict conditions to prevent tampering or transfer of the property during the criminal investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case