Bank of Baroda vs Sunil Tejrao Parhad — 671/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG030038522026
e-Filing Number
24-01-2026
Filing Number
3852/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
671/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bank of Baroda
Adv. KOLTE MITHIL HARISHCHANDRA
Respondent(s)
Sunil Tejrao Parhad
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
Disposed
First Order
First Order
First Order
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | First Order |
| 02-03-2026 | First Order |
| 26-02-2026 | First Order |
| 21-02-2026 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur allowed Bank of Baroda's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a mortgaged apartment (Chintamani Complex-3, Nagpur) valued at Rs. 20 lakhs due to the borrower's default on an outstanding loan amount of Rs. 12,30,146.70. The court appointed Advocate Sheikh Altaf Mohammeddeen as Court Commissioner to execute the possession order within 60 days, with authority to use force if necessary, after issuing a demand notice that the borrower failed to comply with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur allowed Bank of Baroda's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a mortgaged apartment (Chintamani Complex-3, Nagpur) valued at Rs. 20 lakhs due to the borrower's default on an outstanding loan amount of Rs. 12,30,146.70. The court appointed Advocate Sheikh Altaf Mohammeddeen as Court Commissioner to execute the possession order within 60 days, with authority to use force if necessary, after issuing a demand notice that the borrower failed to comply with. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts