Bank of India vs Kiran Sureshrao Hedau — 670/2026
Case under Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act Section 14. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 12th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG030038512026
e-Filing Number
23-01-2026
Filing Number
3851/2026
Filing Date
05-02-2026
Registration No
670/2026
Registration Date
07-02-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Bank of India
Adv. KOLTE MITHIL HARISHCHANDRA
Respondent(s)
Kiran Sureshrao Hedau
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate Nagpur.
Disposed
First Order
First Order
First Order
First Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 06-03-2026 | First Order |
| 02-03-2026 | First Order |
| 26-02-2026 | First Order |
| 21-02-2026 | First Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur allowed Bank of India's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a residential apartment (Flat No. 808, valued at Rs. 29,70,000) mortgaged by the borrower Kiran Hedau, who defaulted on his home loan repayment. The court appointed Advocate Sheikh Altaf Mohammeddeen as Court Commissioner to execute the possession order within 60 days, with authority to use force if necessary, relying on precedent that magistrates need only verify the bank issued a demand notice under Section 13(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nagpur allowed Bank of India's application under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002 to take possession of a residential apartment (Flat No. 808, valued at Rs. 29,70,000) mortgaged by the borrower Kiran Hedau, who defaulted on his home loan repayment. The court appointed Advocate Sheikh Altaf Mohammeddeen as Court Commissioner to execute the possession order within 60 days, with authority to use force if necessary, relying on precedent that magistrates need only verify the bank issued a demand notice under Section 13(2). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts