Nilesh Kishorrao Ambilwade vs PSO Ganeshpeth Nagpur — 525/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 175(3). Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 18th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG030032632026
e-Filing Number
30-01-2026
Filing Number
3263/2026
Filing Date
30-01-2026
Registration No
525/2026
Registration Date
30-01-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
Decision Date
18th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--REJECTED
FIR Details
Police Station
Ganeshpeth
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nilesh Kishorrao Ambilwade
Adv. Shri. Roshan R Bagde
Yamini Nilesh Ambilwade
Adv. Shri. Roshan R Bagde
Adarsh Nilesh Ambliwade
Adv. Shri. Roshan R Bagde
Respondent(s)
PSO Ganeshpeth Nagpur
Hearing History
Judge: 12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
Disposed
Order
Order
Compliance
Hearing
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 18-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 16-03-2026 | Order | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order | |
| 04-03-2026 | Compliance | |
| 20-02-2026 | Hearing |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate rejected an application seeking to register an FIR against neighbors for alleged assault and outraging of modesty during a property dispute. The court found that while a fight occurred over illegal pendol erection on the applicant's land, the CCTV footage failed to establish the essential legal ingredients of sections 74 and 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sahita (BNS)—the only cognizable offences claimed—as there was no prima facie evidence of intentional assault to outrage modesty, merely a heated altercation with resulting injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Nagpur Judicial Magistrate rejected an application seeking to register an FIR against neighbors for alleged assault and outraging of modesty during a property dispute. The court found that while a fight occurred over illegal pendol erection on the applicant's land, the CCTV footage failed to establish the essential legal ingredients of sections 74 and 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sahita (BNS)—the only cognizable offences claimed—as there was no prima facie evidence of intentional assault to outrage modesty, merely a heated altercation with resulting injuries. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts