State of Maharashtra vs Mohd. Arif Mohd. Ikbal — 1701/2025
Case under Bombay Police Act Section 102,117. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG030023922025
Filing Number
2391/2025
Filing Date
29-Jan-2025
Registration No
1701/2025
Registration Date
29-Jan-2025
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
14-16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
Decision Date
12-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
Last updated 24-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
24
Police Station
Traffic Chamber 2
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Mohd. Arif Mohd. Ikbal
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary: The Nagpur First Class Judicial Magistrate court discharged accused Mohd. Arif in a summons case for offences under Sections 102 and 117 of the Maharashtra Police Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that despite issuance of summons since 2025, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence with no likelihood of future appearance, making continued proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Mar-2026
Disposed
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
19-Jan-2026
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
08-Dec-2025
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
13-Sep-2025
Awaiting Summons
16th Jt. C.J.J. D. J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
10-May-2025
Awaiting Summons
13th Jt. C.J.J.D. And J.M.F.C Nagpur
-
22-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Jan-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1701/2025
Summary: The Nagpur First Class Judicial Magistrate court discharged accused Mohd. Arif in a summons case for offences under Sections 102 and 117 of the Maharashtra Police Act, invoking Section 281 of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita. The court found that despite issuance of summons since 2025, the prosecution failed to secure the accused's presence with no likelihood of future appearance, making continued proceedings futile. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts