Vimla Wdo Kisan Lute thorough POA Onkar SO Viju Lute vs State of Maharashtra Through PSO Ganeshpeth — 199/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG030013522026
e-Filing Number
09-01-2026
Filing Number
1352/2026
Filing Date
09-01-2026
Registration No
199/2026
Registration Date
09-01-2026
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur
Judge
12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
FIR Details
FIR Number
004
Police Station
Ganeshpeth
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Vimla Wdo Kisan Lute thorough POA Onkar SO Viju Lute
Adv. Yash Ajay Gangotri
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra Through PSO Ganeshpeth
Hearing History
Judge: 12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur
Disposed
Order
Compliance
Compliance
Order
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | Order | |
| 27-02-2026 | Compliance | |
| 20-02-2026 | Compliance | |
| 13-02-2026 | Order |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of seized gold jewelry (weighing approximately 32.39 grams across multiple items) valued at ₹2,67,000, which was stolen from the petitioner's possession on 31 October 2025. The court found the petitioner to be the lawful owner based on affidavits and the investigating officer's statement, and ordered return of the seized articles upon furnishing a ₹1,00,000 bail bond, subject to conditions that the petitioner produce the items when required and not alter or transfer them until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of seized gold jewelry (weighing approximately 32.39 grams across multiple items) valued at ₹2,67,000, which was stolen from the petitioner's possession on 31 October 2025. The court found the petitioner to be the lawful owner based on affidavits and the investigating officer's statement, and ordered return of the seized articles upon furnishing a ₹1,00,000 bail bond, subject to conditions that the petitioner produce the items when required and not alter or transfer them until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts