Vimla Wdo Kisan Lute thorough POA Onkar SO Viju Lute vs State of Maharashtra Through PSO Ganeshpeth — 199/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG030013522026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-01-2026

Filing Number

1352/2026

Filing Date

09-01-2026

Registration No

199/2026

Registration Date

09-01-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur

Judge

12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

004

Police Station

Ganeshpeth

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Vimla Wdo Kisan Lute thorough POA Onkar SO Viju Lute

Adv. Yash Ajay Gangotri

Respondent(s)

State of Maharashtra Through PSO Ganeshpeth

Hearing History

Judge: 12-14th Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dn. And JMFC Nagpur

16-03-2026

Disposed

10-03-2026

Order

27-02-2026

Compliance

20-02-2026

Compliance

13-02-2026

Order

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of seized gold jewelry (weighing approximately 32.39 grams across multiple items) valued at ₹2,67,000, which was stolen from the petitioner's possession on 31 October 2025. The court found the petitioner to be the lawful owner based on affidavits and the investigating officer's statement, and ordered return of the seized articles upon furnishing a ₹1,00,000 bail bond, subject to conditions that the petitioner produce the items when required and not alter or transfer them until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted the petitioner's application under CrPC Section 503 for interim custody of seized gold jewelry (weighing approximately 32.39 grams across multiple items) valued at ₹2,67,000, which was stolen from the petitioner's possession on 31 October 2025. The court found the petitioner to be the lawful owner based on affidavits and the investigating officer's statement, and ordered return of the seized articles upon furnishing a ₹1,00,000 bail bond, subject to conditions that the petitioner produce the items when required and not alter or transfer them until trial completion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Nagpur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case