Laxman Tukaram Durge vs Sadasheo Parvat Dhoke Dead — 6/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 24. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 10th April 2026.
Civil M.A.
CNR: MHNG010166022025
e-Filing Number
18-12-2025
Filing Number
9636/2025
Filing Date
23-Dec-2025
Registration No
6/2026
Registration Date
02-Jan-2026
Court
District and Session Court , Nagpur
Judge
1-Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING
Last updated 24-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Laxman Tukaram Durge
Adv. GANESH HEMRAJJI BARANGE
Respondent(s)
-
1.Sadasheo Parvat Dhoke Dead
-
2.Damodhar Parvat Dhoke
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The Principal District Judge Nagpur allowed the transfer application under Section 24 CPC, transferring Miscellaneous Case No.830 of 2025 (alleging breach of injunction) from the 2nd Joint Civil Judge Junior Division to the 2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, where the original civil suit No.1322 of 1991 is pending. The court directed both cases to be tagged together for administrative efficiency, with no costs imposed, as the defendant did not object to the transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Notice
Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
18-Feb-2026
Steps
Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
28-Jan-2026
Steps
Principal District And Sessions Judge,Nagpur
-
02-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2026
The Principal District Judge Nagpur allowed the transfer application under Section 24 CPC, transferring Miscellaneous Case No.830 of 2025 (alleging breach of injunction) from the 2nd Joint Civil Judge Junior Division to the 2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, where the original civil suit No.1322 of 1991 is pending. The court directed both cases to be tagged together for administrative efficiency, with no costs imposed, as the defendant did not object to the transfer. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts