Rajendra Tukaram Shinde vs The Commissioner Nagpur Municipal Corporation — 348/2025

Case under Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act Section 81F. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

M.C.A. - Misc.Civil Appeal

CNR: MHNG010156252025

Filing Number

9122/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

348/2025

Registration Date

05-Dec-2025

Court

District and Session Court , Nagpur

Judge

25-District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act Section 81F

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajendra Tukaram Shinde

    Adv. B. R. Waghmare

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Commissioner Nagpur Municipal Corporation

  2. 2.The Deputy Commissioner Estate

  3. 3.Abhyankar Smarak trust

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Summary The District Court of Nagpur dismissed eight consolidated appeals challenging eviction orders issued by the Nagpur Municipal Corporation. The court ruled that tenants of the Abhyankar Smarak Trust (which occupied NMC land under an expired 1937 lease) were unauthorized occupants, as the 30-year lease expired in 1967 and was never renewed. The court found the eviction notice legally valid under Section 81-B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, as the trust and its sub-tenants lacked authorized possession of the corporation's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Disposed

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  4. 06-May-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  5. 04-May-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  6. 30-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  7. 28-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  8. 20-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  9. 06-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  10. 23-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  11. 10-Mar-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  12. 17-Feb-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  13. 05-Feb-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  14. 22-Jan-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  15. 16-Jan-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  16. 08-Jan-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  17. 05-Jan-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  18. 03-Jan-2026

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  19. 24-Dec-2025

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  20. 22-Dec-2025

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  21. 19-Dec-2025

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  22. 17-Dec-2025

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  23. 11-Dec-2025

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  24. 06-Dec-2025

    Order

    District Judge 6 And Add.Sessions Judge,Nagpur

  25. 05-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 348/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The District Court of Nagpur dismissed eight consolidated appeals challenging eviction orders issued by the Nagpur Municipal Corporation. The court ruled that tenants of the Abhyankar Smarak Trust (which occupied NMC land under an expired 1937 lease) were unauthorized occupants, as the 30-year lease expired in 1967 and was never renewed. The court found the eviction notice legally valid under Section 81-B of the Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, as the trust and its sub-tenants lacked authorized possession of the corporation's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case